@Prof.NightJack
>Being THIS butthurt over the mechanics of a site dedicated to hosting fan-made images of a little girl’s show, plenty of it porn
It’s splerging.
@Silent_Witness
Well then you are not thinking, ed put all the tags and pointed out the image it’s an edit for, meaning he SAW the artist tag, but DIDN’T think to put it.
THAT is the problem, it was skipped over then it was an important tag.
@Prof.NightJack
Then I don’t see what the problem is. After all, anyone in the community has the ability to correct the tags and source of an image if they find an error in them.
@Prof.NightJack
Wow, what a shame. If only we had a means to edit the tags of an image to more accurately reflect all relevant information.
Oh wait, we already have that, don’t we?
Two thing.
1 - Who’s butthurt? Annoyed yes,but not butthurt.
2 -
>Being THIS butthurt over the mechanics of a site dedicated to hosting fan-made images of a little girl’s show, plenty of it porn
It’s splerging.
That makes no sense.
Splerging at its finest.
Well then you are not thinking, ed put all the tags and pointed out the image it’s an edit for, meaning he SAW the artist tag, but DIDN’T think to put it.
THAT is the problem, it was skipped over then it was an important tag.
What is it with all EQG underwear edits lately?
Then I don’t see what the problem is. After all, anyone in the community has the ability to correct the tags and source of an image if they find an error in them.
I did add it.
And you were prevented from adding the tag yourself when you noticed this… how, exactly?
My point was more that he had all the other tags and knew what it was an edit for but didn’t put that important tag.
Wow, what a shame. If only we had a means to edit the tags of an image to more accurately reflect all relevant information.
Oh wait, we already have that, don’t we?
Apologies, I’m a noob at ing and was in a hurry.
>says what image is it an edit of
>don’t put the artist tag
….