Object 120 is sooo much fun. I mean comeon, 152mm auto loader with 480mm pen that doesnt drop off over distance and the shell travels straight. Accuracy is insane, damage is insane, pen is insane, I completely covered mine in bushes, find some brush, and start one shotting the entire enemy team!
I play both arcade and realistic tanks and planes, I have up to 8.0 plane and 7.7 tank, My preferred Tanks are the Object 120, JS-6, T-34-100, KV-2 and T-35. My preferred planes are the Pe-8, Tu-14, IL-28,I-153p, Yak-9k and the Yak-3(d-107) “Im Mainly a bomber player”
@Commissar Junior
I’m a tank RB player, (catching up after getting to top tier jets in all nations) , and using the fab 5000 on a crowded cap point is kamikaze worthy not to say I won’t load the 1000s if there’s no large groups
Personally I prefer the 40 100kg bombs over the 5000, I mean I loooove the 5000kg bomb but being able to take out a whole defensive line in one go is pretty nice.
@TotallyNotANoob
That would make sense… Perhaps Pegasi were fighters/torpedo bombers/interceptors/fighter-bombers. Chariots were medium bombers/heavy fighters. And airships were heavy bombers/literal flying fortresses.
@infinita est lux Solis
That sounds way too heavy. I think similar to our planes single pegasi couldn’t lift much even without armor, so their bombers should be something like redisigned chariots.
Single pegasi would be better as i fighter, maybe with ability to equip one or two small bombs. And if it will be armored, armor will only protect vital organs, becouse you just can’t armor the whole thing in a way thar armor will be thick enough and it’s owner still be airborne. Google up armor schematics of any ww2 planes, you’ll see that even most armored of them barely reach even light ground armored units lavel of protection.
I’ve always imagined Equestrian bombers were pegasi with bombs mounted to their undersides and massive sheets of metal mounted to their wings as armor.
It’s less fun when you’re the one on the receiving end of the turkey shoot lmao
That said I do get the satisfaction of abusing T-34s, T-44s and T-54s with the Centurions and IS-6s with the Conway so I can’t complain too much
Edited because: Brush was a better word rather then bushes again.
Brit APDS might not be good against 120s
But my L7 trigger finger itches thinking about the Ho Ri’s casemate cheeks
laughs in Ho Ri
Object 120
You are a cruel man
Cries in Patton
Cries in no hullbreak Brit APDS
Neat
I’m a tank RB player, (catching up after getting to top tier jets in all nations) , and using the fab 5000 on a crowded cap point is kamikaze worthy
not to say I won’t load the 1000s if there’s no large groups
Edited
The PE-8 isn’t carrying the FAB-5000
That would make sense… Perhaps Pegasi were fighters/torpedo bombers/interceptors/fighter-bombers. Chariots were medium bombers/heavy fighters. And airships were heavy bombers/literal flying fortresses.
That sounds way too heavy. I think similar to our planes single pegasi couldn’t lift much even without armor, so their bombers should be something like redisigned chariots.
Single pegasi would be better as i fighter, maybe with ability to equip one or two small bombs. And if it will be armored, armor will only protect vital organs, becouse you just can’t armor the whole thing in a way thar armor will be thick enough and it’s owner still be airborne. Google up armor schematics of any ww2 planes, you’ll see that even most armored of them barely reach even light ground armored units lavel of protection.