princess's profile

@mevova3594
Did you mean to share a higher-quality version of this drawing to Derpibooru? Because that’s a beautiful PNG!

FYI: the right way to replace an image on Derpibooru with a higher-quality version is to it as a new image, then report the original for merging into the new one.

I did it at >>3877084 - it would be awesome if you could add the address of the VK post (or wherever you found that version) to it as a source.

@powi nona
There should be an option for that in Settings > Change name. Site s should also be able to help with this; it’s definitely possible.

Not all bibles are pitch documents. Some, like this one (which, by the way, is ANG’s movie bible, not a show bible), are records of final creative decisions that were made and work that’s already finished, intended to inform future work based on it like marketing campaigns or further media like shows, comics, books, games, more movies, and spinoffs.

This document starts precisely with explaining how Zipp’s gender is to be expressed in media without explicitly calling it out in-universe. From my read of the actual movie and even later media, that aspect of Zipp was handled in perfect consistency with how it’s described here, so I don’t see what makes the argument for Zipp being female stronger than the argument for her being nonbinary.

By the “only a character verbally announcing their gender can make it canon” logic you seem to want, Zipp’s gender wouldn’t be female as you ionately argue but undefined (and the same would go for every other character for that matter - Zipp having finished media imply rather than explicitly call out her gender is the same way Sunny, Hitch, Izzy, and everyone else were handled). If you want to argue that Zipp is female, the onus is on you to positively demonstrate that this is the case. Disproving all the positive evidence we have that she’s nonbinary (which you haven’t persuasively done but let’s imagine that you hypothetically did) still wouldn’t prove that she’s female.

Serving as a reference - not pitch - for the movie’s canon, vibes, and creative intent is literally this document’s purpose. Details that were thought about but not yet committed to at the time of writing are noted with question marks. Zipp’s gender and how it should be portrayed is clearly not one of them.